I know a woman, R, my grandmom’s age who had 6 daughters and a son, who was the youngest. She wanted her daughters to be happy. So, she prayed that all the daughters have a son as the first born child. She said she didn’t want to go through all the “pressure” the society put on her. She was fed up of the society calling her “Mom of 6 girls”, before she got a son. She herself believed that sons are “old-age-support” and daughters are “no return upon investment”. She did not mistreat her girls per se, instead, “raised them right” by leading them to believe they will get married and go to their sasural, where they need to get the “best bahu award”, by winning hearts and taking care of everybody there. She has great satisfaction of being “nice” to her daughters, for being able to arrange traditional weddings for each one of them and for having the “good fortune” of kanyadaan.

She is the Indian mother of the 50’s, who we see around as a contented grandmom, telling epic tales of how each and every daughter got married.  Here are the sins she committed towards the society:

1. Preference for a gender based on roles that she assigned to her children.
2. Assumption that it’s the son who is going to care for her.No responsibility given to daughters. (No wonder she prides about being nice to the girls, in spite of zero return on investment)
3. Though used derogatorily on her,the term ‘Mom of 6 girls’ was a fact. There was nothing to be ashamed of, had she chosen not to assign gender roles.
4. Passing on her bias to her children and further contributing to the gender bias in the society.
5. Assumption that a daughter is an object of the household that is a “donation” (yes, that’s what “daan” means) to another household.

One of her daughters X, had an abusive mother-in-law. She was told by R to “adjust” in her new home. That abuse was supposedly just a “test” for good marriage. The daughter adjusted so much that intermittent lack of abuse from her mother-in-law was considered  an act of great kindness. Isn’t this Stockholm syndrome? On X’s 25th marriage anniversary celebration, the mother-in-law complimented her on her saree and performed a couple of rituals to get rid of the evil eye (nazar utarna). This was considered the greatest benevolence of all times and “all the hard work of adjustment has paid off” started doing the rounds. Imagine 25 years of abuse to get this ultra-prestigious award!

Am I the only one here who finds this ridiculous?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Wake-up!!!

  1. Whoop dee doo! How gracious of the MIL! Such a nice, caring person. How could anyone ever think of a better gift than complimenting one’s CLOTHING and carrying out voodoo rituals?


    This isn’t even ordinary Stockholm Syndrome, you know. It’s like a massive, pumped up, zombie-brainwashed, version of it carried out over a freaking quarter of a century.

    I think it’s important to point out that in such contexts, “Adjusting” is little more than a euphemism for putting up with coercion. Like the phrase “eve teasing”, it seeks to downplay real abusive behavior and pass it off as a kind of relatively harmless cultural phenomenon. It’s not “the hard work of adjustment”, people. It’s putting up with ABUSE, plain and simple. Let’s be clear on this. Let’s call things for what they are.

  2. Thanks CynicallyEngineered for visiting my blog! You are the first one to comment here 😀 I totally agree with what you say. It’s not “hard work of adjustment”, it’s ” putting up with abuse”.

  3. Mandooka says:

    (From wikipedia entry on Stockholm syndrome)..victims, who essentially mistake a lack of abuse from their captors for an act of kindness.
    Totally explains the gratefulness of the abused younger woman at this silly ritual. After all the daughter-in-law was held hostage over several years!
    Reminds me of a lady I knew once who had a super-abusive mother-in-law. Towards the fag end of her life, the old woman fell ill and was cared for by the daughter-in-law. But to the very last, the old woman abused and cursed the younger woman. Interestingly, when the evil hag died, to everyone’s surprise, the DIL was the one person who cried the most and missed her the most.

  4. It is Stockholm Syndrome. And in return of fulfilling their duty by not supporting their daughters against abuse , such parents expect the society to help them when its their turn to abuse their daughters in law.
    Also, any support to the abuse victim by her parents is seen as ‘interference’ (if the victim is female). One court actually pointed out that interference from women’s parents leads to divorce, and saw such divorces not as getting the victim out of an abusive situation, but as breaking up of families.

  5. Hello again, STF

    It’s time for a new post, maybe?

    You’re an awesome writer and there’s too little stuff here to satisfy my appetite for awesomeness. Keep going!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s